This enforcement policy sets out the general principles and approach that the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) will take to enforce the Veterinary Medicines Regulations (Statutory instrument 2013 No. 2033).
The Secretary of State owns the powers provided by the Veterinary Medicines Regulations (VMR), which include powers of entry and powers of an inspector.
It is however the responsibility of the VMD to ensure these regulations are enforced in accordance with our Privacy Notice.
We aim to protect public health, animal health and the environment, and to promote animal welfare by assuring the safety, quality and efficacy of veterinary medicines. In accordance with the VMR the definition of a veterinary medicine is;
Any substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or preventing diseases in animals; or
Any substance or combination of substances that may be used in, or administered to, animals with a view either to restoring, correcting, or modifying physiological functions by exerting a pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic action, or to making a medical diagnosis
We meet our aims through proportionate risk-based regulation, providing high quality services to stakeholders and enforcement partners.
We receive information (unverified and unevaluated data) and intelligence (evaluated data) from a range of sources such as the pharmaceutical industry, veterinarians, general public and other stakeholders. This data is analyzed and we may share it with our enforcement partners in accordance with our Privacy Notice.
The purpose and method of enforcement
“Enforcement” refers to any action taken by us in relation to suspected breaches of the VMR.
The purpose of enforcement is to secure compliance with the requirements of the VMR.
In keeping with Defra’s approach to better regulation and enforcement, we recognize that the best way to achieve compliance is to ensure that those carrying out regulated or unregulated activities understand their responsibilities.
We therefore seek to work with businesses and individuals to assist them in complying with the legislation through the provision of advice and guidance.
However, where necessary we will use more formal means of enforcement against a business or an individual to secure compliance, which include:
issuing advisory and warning letters
serving enforcement notices
removing non-compliant social media posts, posts from online marketplaces and websites
variation, suspension or revocation of authorizations or approvals
destruction of products
The principles of enforcement
This Enforcement Policy embraces the key principles of proportionality, consistency, and transparency.
All our enforcement action is risk-based. The enforcement action we take will be graduated and proportionate to the assessed risks associated with an illegal activity. Where the risks are considered to be low or there is no history of non-compliance, enforcement action will generally be delivered through advice.
However where the risks are considered greater, for example when dealing with an incident involving food-producing animals or antibiotics, or similar non-compliance has previously been identified, more formal action will be considered.
We aim to be consistent in our approach when dealing with non-compliance. Therefore, similar non-compliances will be dealt with in the same measure and fashion.
Offenses are clearly specified in the VMR (regulation 43) and the final paragraph of each Schedule to the VMR).
It is important that stakeholders, businesses and individuals understand what is expected of them, and the consequences of any non-compliance.
Therefore, through routine engagement and publication of guidance and advice, we aim to make stakeholders, businesses, and individuals aware of the relevant requirements of the VMR.
We will clearly explain the relevance of the statutory requirements and what is considered to be good practice.
Advisory and Warning letters
Advisory and warning letters are the initial steps within our enforcement process.
Letters are prepared on a case-by-case basis and aim to ensure the intended recipient is aware of the necessary requirements to achieve compliance with the VMR.
Advisory letters can be considered as ‘educational’ letters.
Removal of non-compliant posts online
We monitor content placed on online marketplaces and websites to ensure that they comply with the VMR and that there is no unauthorized marketing, sale and supply.
In cases where non-compliance is identified we seek to remove offending posts, websites, and social media content.
The VMR gives inspectors the powers to serve an improvement notice on any person or business they believe is not complying with the legislation.
The notice will clearly set out:
how that person or business is failing to comply with the VMR
the exact nature of the failure
the measures that need to be taken to comply
All improvement notices will be given at least fourteen days within which required corrective action must be taken to ensure compliance.
Failure to comply with an improvement notice is an offence.
In the case of a business authorized or approved by the VMD to carry out an activity, this may result in a compulsory variation, suspension, or in the most serious of cases, revocation of that business’s authorization or approval.
In this instance we will write to the business explaining the decision, the options for appeal, and outline the processes to be followed to appeal to an appointed person.
A person may appeal against being served an improvement notice to a magistrates’ court or, in Scotland to the sheriff, within 28 days or the period specified in the improvement notice, whichever ends the earlier.
The improvement notice sets out the appeals procedure.
The VMR gives inspectors the power to seize veterinary medicines, purporting anything to be a veterinary medicine, additives, premixtures or feedingstuffs to which Schedule 5 applies, that may have been illegally imported, supplied, marketed or administered.
They have powers to seize electronic devices and associated equipment, as well as documentation.
The inspector must serve a seizure notice on the person appearing to be responsible for the product, which sets out details of:
If inspectors are not able to remove seized products immediately, they may serve a notice on the person appearing to be responsible for the products prohibiting the products’ movement from the premises until the product is collected.
A person may within 28 days of seizure notify any claim that the product was not liable to seizure to the Secretary of State at the address specified on the seizure notice, setting out the grounds in full.
Where there is a significant risk to human or animal health or the environment or where a business or individual continues an illegal activity that has already been brought to their attention, the case will normally be considered for prosecution.
Investigations into such illegal activities are carried out by enforcement officers from the VMD or by officers from Defra Investigation Services (DIS) on behalf of the VMD. All investigations will be carried out in accordance with relevant investigative procedures.
Following an investigation and where there is sufficient evidence of an offence, the case may be referred to the Crown Prosecution Service or the Procurator Fiscal in Scotland.
A person prosecuted and found guilty of an offense under the VMR (regulation 44) is liable:
on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or both; or
on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both
We may also look to prosecute under other regulations if further offenses are identified.
Publication of Enforcement Action
We may publish on GOV.UK enforcement notices, suspension and revocation of authorizations and approvals, and outcomes of prosecutions.
See our guidance pages on:
For further information contact the Enforcement Section at email@example.com.